Log in
Free: The Observer Mobile App - Exclusive Content and Services

The test of police efficiency is the absence of crime

President Yoweri Museveni inside police's CCTV control room in Naguru

President Yoweri Museveni inside police's CCTV control room in Naguru

Crime affects every family, every organisation, business and every country.

Governments spend substantial amounts on law enforcement and dealing with crime after it has occurred; but shouldn’t the focus be crime prevention and crime reduction? This piece looks at what is going wrong between the public, government and the police. There is a huge gap between how we want to be policed, how the police want to police us and how we are actually policed. Why is there this gap and what can be done about it?

First of all, what does the public want? I believe the public is not interested whether burglaries have gone up or down by five per cent. They want to know that when they go to bed at night, they are not going to get broke into.

What kind of policing the public is getting is clear from a recent letter I received from one of my followers. She had noticed six police officers manning one female. Why, she wondered, do the police need six officers for this task? But when her house is burgled, you cannot find a policeman for love or money.

Serious crime is ignored and minor crime elevated to the level of the serious in order to satisfy the measurement regime. The police are forced to make fools of themselves; and for what end? Fulfilling government targets is not leading to better policing. One officer told me recently: We are bringing more and more people to justice—but they are the wrong people.”

The public prefer the foot patrol as top of the list. Sadly, the government prefers to reward that ‘visible’ evidence of police action. The absence of crime and disorder is not a target—not even for safer community policing.

Dear Mr President, now that we have slid into 2020, there are three key messages to keep in mind: make law and justice policy decisions based on evidence, not populism; be open to public scrutiny on any changes you propose; and keep testing what works and what doesn’t.

Crime prevention

Focusing on would-be offenders, likely victims and potential crime hotspots would save taxpayers’ money and keep more people safe. But “primitive” technology is limiting officers’ ability to do that.

Crime prevention was the primary purpose of policing and, with regard to persistent offenders in particular, officers must make it as hard as possible to commit the crime in the first place.

Resources should be targeted at crime hotspots, used to identify repeat and vulnerable victims of crime and find out where the most prolific, persistent and dangerous offenders in the community reside.

But to do this, officers need access to much better technology, ideally a smartphone-like device so each individual could hold force intelligence in his hand.

The crimes to watch

Focus on policies that work to prevent or reduce real crime problems. Don’t be distracted by populist issues, pet projects or knee-jerk reactions.

Instead, look to the substantial evidence base on what does and doesn’t work to reduce real offending, at times the government often seems pressured to respond to media by enacting ‘’tougher law and order policies’’ – even if being tough doesn’t always cut crime or help the victims of it.

In my view, develop a blueprint for evidence-based crime policy for reducing criminal activity in Kampala Metropolitan areas. Establish an independent agency to collate, analyse and interpret crime data and develop evidence-based policy.

Invest in evidence-based early intervention programs to reduce offending by young people, including social support for at-risk youth.

Consultation and evaluation

Your government should also focus on rebuilding engagement and trust with the institutions of law and justice, and with the community.

Good relationships with the judiciary, legal profession, police and prison staff are essential to an effective criminal justice system. Re-introduce or respect parliamentary and other processes that facilitate this, and welcome input from the community and relevant experts.

Build partnerships with the private sector and with universities to assist in developing the evidence base essential for good policy. Support your public servants to provide independent and experienced insights on difficult problems.

Listening to this kind of frank and fearless advice before you bring in new big policies is the best way to avoid a public backlash in the long run.

Some people will urge you to simply tackle “law and order” problems. Aiming for law and justice for all citizens is, in many ways, a much tougher ask.

But if your goal is a safer Uganda, law and justice is the best way to achieve it – and that means starting with the evidence before you, and using it to build a case for change. 

musonirichard@hotmail.com

Twitter: @musaazi22

The author is a private investigator and founder of Richards Private Investigations.

Comments

+1 #1 Davis 2020-01-17 01:18
Police is not for crime prevention, but it can be a deterrent, if its main functions are of high standard. What are main functions? Top of the list, is investigation and prosecution of criminal acts.

Second, is maintenance of order through effective deployments and good public engagement.

Police are not social workers. Early interventìon in problen areas is for other people to handle. Police powers are focused on detention and prosecution, not social psychology and macro economics.
Report to administrator
0 #2 Richard musaazi 2020-01-19 08:35
Davis, "The purpose of the police is to prevent crime taking place and to keep people safe," "Sir Robert Peel, who founded the modern police service in 1829, said the primary test is the absence of crime and disorder."

Have you noticed? Police is so keen to be seen working hard when has been committed. "Prevention is far better than cure in policing and criminal justice.

We need to stop thinking like ordinary police officers. In my view, test of police efficiency has to be the absence of crime and disorder, not the visible evidence of police action to deal with it
Report to administrator
0 #3 Davis 2020-01-19 14:16
Richard, Robert Peel was a former military man from 19th century.

We are in 21st century. Police cannot prevent crime. How can 100,000 people stop 40 million from committing crime? Even the police has criminals inside it.

The countries with low crime rate like UAE are influenced by very strong cultural and religious attitudes.

Countries like USA, with very good police, have very very high crime rates. UK, where Robert Peel is from, has very high crime. South Africa has better police than Uganda. But look at their crime rate.

So, police cannot prevent. But they can investigate and prosecute. That is the best deterrent. The rest is about morality. Police cannot enforce morals.
Report to administrator
0 #4 Davis 2020-01-19 14:21
Richard, do not down play the political influence on police. Police is a tool of the state. If the state is corrupted, then how do you expect police to be effective?

You must also find out what causes crime? Did police cause poverty? Can police solve poverty? Is that their work? Those are political questions. Police cannot be made responsible for political matters.

Absence of crime is a symptom of a politically harmonious society. Unless you want a North Korea type police state.
Report to administrator
0 #5 Kirya 2020-01-21 06:51
Is to arrest m7 and his mafia family without fear just like the young man has shown the way.

All Ugandans should follow his courage. M7 has done all the wrong things in our name because were sleeping while he was busy stealing!
Report to administrator

Comments are now closed for this entry