Log in

Buganda in the eyes of the diaspora

On August 30, signs of what Uganda has become started showing at Entebbe airport before I boarded a KLM flight to New York to attend an annual conference of Baganda at Westin, near Princeton University.

In the VIP lounge at Entebbe, I met Henry Mayega who, about five years ago, was rewarded with a deputy ambassadorial appointment for crossing from Uganda People’s Congress (UPC) to the ruling National Resistance Movement (NRM).

Before his formal appointment, Mayega was roaming FM radio stations as a special NRM mobilizer. At Entebbe, like many new NRM converts who routinely seek to impress their new masters, Mayega was dressed in a yellow T-shirt and was carrying a yellow travel bag.

He really looked almost entirely yellow, more yellow than Arua Municipality MP Ibrahim Abiriga. This gentleman is Uganda’s deputy ambassador to China.

At Amsterdam, we took different flights; he flew to Miami to attend the Ugandan North American Association (UNAA) conference and I to New York to attend the Ttabamiruka.

Mayega typifies the new relationship that the revolutionary has built with many politicians. And I know he despises them and holds the rest of us in contempt. He has reduced us into mercenaries who are in politics to hunt for fortunes.

I know Mayega and I met him several times when I was still a journalist with The Observer. There was a time I met him at Makerere University in the office of the vice chancellor.

I was crosschecking information on how Ms Janet Kataaha had illegally joined Makerere for a bachelor’s degree in education. 

Mayega was a personal assistant to the then vice chancellor and we really had a good conversation. But at Entebbe, he only opened his mouth when I greeted him and shut it up for the next one hour of waiting. I think he cannot afford a conversation with an FDC spokesperson.

To the contrary, those who are close to Museveni have, either through experience or security of tenure, learnt to be humble and sociable.

That is the experience I got when I shared many hours of flight with Moses Byaruhanga, a senior presidential advisor, from Amsterdam to Entebbe. Byaruhanga, who told me he is turning 50 this year, even spoke about life after public service and how he was preparing for it.

He kept selling Uganda to any foreigner who lent him an ear, including flight attendants. One female attendant told him she could not spend her vacation in Uganda because the country is chaotic where animals and human beings cross highways like their sitting rooms.

She said she experienced this once when she was being driven to a hotel in Kampala. At Westin Princeton at Forrestal Village hotel, Ttabamiruka, under the theme “Breaking Ground on a New Buganda, Rooted in Tradition,” discussed ways through which Buganda can gain some of its lost glory.

Ggwanga Mujje New Jersey/New York, the organizers of Ttabamiruka, used the conference to also commemorate the 10th anniversary of these conferences. The organizers are a radical group who call a spade a spade.

Their view, which I also share, is that Buganda must be treated as a shareholder in the company called Uganda. Buganda must not be boxed in a corner where it negotiates surrender with the occupier.

Three presentations by Mr Ssewava Sserubiri (former Buganda minister), Florence Bagunywa Nkalubo (former Buganda minister) and Eng Allan Waligo Nakirembeka (former clan leaders’ speaker) energized participants who vowed to stop lamentations.

For Buganda to gain some of its lost glory, it must demand the return of the 9,000 square miles of land currently managed and abused by district land boards.

The administrative structures that won admiration from the British colonialists must be revived and strengthened. And of course Buganda must invest in its youthful population. There were other radical resolutions.

Ttabamiruka is the only conference for Ugandans in diaspora the state does not control. And for me, like I have said many times before, this is where we have gone wrong as a country and as a continent.

Those in power have wronged everybody and keep looking over their shoulders to identify pursuers. It is the reason they send delegations to diaspora conferences not to listen, but to control proceedings.

One of the reasons the diaspora is very attractive to African autocrats is because it is liberated and well resourced. Nigeria, for example, receives in the range of $20 billion and $30 billion from its estimated 20 million people who live abroad.

Senegal, Kenya and Uganda each receive between $1 billion and $2 billion. Recent figures from the ministry of Finance suggest that only tourism has overtaken remittances from Ugandans abroad in earning us foreign exchange. Nigeria recently introduced a diaspora bond to tap into these resources.

As usual, instead of starting a conversation with Ugandans abroad on how genuinely they can help develop their country, we are sending Abiriga-like delegates to wave bisanja at them.

The Gulf countries have learnt from their history. They are sponsoring their children to study at world universities like Princeton so they can return with skills.

For us, those who acquire skills just stay away instead of returning to a country where jobs are given out to those in yellow T-shirts.


The author is Kira Municipality MP and spokesperson of the Forum for Democratic Change.


+1 #41 Kent Mawa 2017-09-16 21:39
Gwok , if you need a historian , we already have one in doctordre.

He defined a nation as follows: "people in land under one government; people from one ethnicity; and a group with a common interest"

He hence concluded that the Kikuyu , Kalenjin and Acholis are also nations.
Do you agree ?

Somewhere else , there is another definition of what makes a nation:
"an aggregation of people or peoples of one or more cultures, races, etc, organized into a single state"

For me , the argument is not whether the constitution lists Buganda at par with other tribes ; it is whether Buganda has the basis to refer to be refered to as a nation.

B. N. has already said that Buganda is not only a tribe but a monarchy `, a land of/ with many tribes and races. She wrote that there are non-Baganda who identify themselves as residents of Buganda.

Lastly , by now we should have learnt that it is Uganda type of "constitution" which defines what we are.
Report to administrator
0 #42 Rajab Kakyama 2017-09-17 09:33
Doctor Dre & GWOK: We do not need a "non Ganda" historian to tell our past afflictions, we need a just mind. It is rather a narrow interpretation that Buganda or Baganda collaborated with the colonialists.

In truth, Buganda vehemently resisted colonial rule- the reason it was declared a "protectorate" and not a "colony"- the reason Kabaka Mwanga was deposed and exiled.

The fact that the colonialists signed the "Buganda Agreement" with a three year old "King" shows the true intent of the colonialists and the true state of affairs- that Buganda was at its knees. It points at hypocrisy and not accuracy to state that the Buganda Agreement led to the signing of other Agreements.

It is important to note that Buganda was a separate entity from other dominions who were under the leadership of their respective native authorities, isn't it therefore, bizarre that the fall of other regions is attributable to Buganda?
Report to administrator
0 #43 Rajab Kakyama 2017-09-17 11:22
What can be said with accuracy is that Buganda has been at the forefront of almost every battle.

That's why it is evident that the signing of the "Buganda Agreement" precipitated the fall of other regional authorities to the colonialists.

That's why when Obote abolished the Kingdom of Buganda (actually, Obote abolished the "state" status of Buganda) it was fait accompli for the rest of other cultural institutions. That's why at the end of the murderous Amin regime it was befitting to install a "Muganda" as a unifying gesture.

That why Museveni found it befitting to start a "liberation" struggle in a the Luweero triangle which provided a conducive and acceptable reception to pacify Uganda.

The only problem that the "pacifiers" of Uganda have turned out to be Buganda's "tormentors." Uganda has turned out to be Buganda's pannier.
Report to administrator
0 #44 Betty Nalubega 2017-09-17 12:35
First of all , I would like to thank and commend OBSERVER for airing our thoughts . 40 comments on one topic is a record that Hon. Nganda should be proud of.

It is very unusual ( unUgandan?) to have such a hot long debate without insulting each other .
We should all be proud

I thank KENT MAWA and RAJAB KAKYAMA for helping me to answer , inform and educate GWOK.
Report to administrator
0 #45 Betty Nalubega 2017-09-17 12:48
History tells us the whole of Africa, except Ethiopia, was colonised. In all colonies , except in BUGANDA, colonialists simply walked in a set the terms .

Te keep on refering to Buganda Agreement , therefore , is to acknowlege the agreement was a work of genius!

Its been 117 years since the agreement was signed ; 55 years since the colonialists left . What have we replaced the "bad agreement "with ?

Dictatorships , wars , massacres , land grabbing , looting , injustice , tribalism ,ethinic cleansing, discrimination ,selective impunity, arrogancy nepotism , betrayal, manipulation, land grabbing and stealthily selling off national resourses to the highest foreigh bidders.
Report to administrator
0 #46 Akot 2017-09-17 19:28
Quoting Kent Mawa:

... by now we should have learnt that it is Uganda type of "constitution" which defines what we are.


It's amaizing even Buganda has not understood that when museveni gets complete control of the zone that formed the Republic of Uganda that he tribally divided thus shattered, not 1 tribe will be at home on even their tribal land!

Museveni amended the Constitution that made our country & not 1 of us saw it or said a word!

The demon is going ahead playing with worlds to further amend the constitution he already did to get what he wants but found he has to further amend it!

Ugandans are just going along debating instead of telling the conqueror 'OUT' in Unity or just forming Independent Tribal States NOW so that museveni has no place to hide in!
Report to administrator
0 #47 Gwok 2017-09-19 01:12
[quote name="Kent Mawa"]Gwok , if you need a historian , we already have one in doctordre. {a} I do not need one. What for? {b} As for "people in land under one government ... " I agree, Somalia excepted.

Please note that in our case "We the people of Uganda" is defined as tribes (our contitution, Article 10).

{c) As for the Kikuyu , Kalenjin and Acholis being nations, I say NOT under our prevailing sitution.

They are tribes, as explained above. {d} please do not mix issues here: the people can be yellow, green, have thier dstinct cultures and type of government, etc, without being a nation.

Are the palestinians a nation too? Some Ugandans also! Surely the Ganda need external help in order to articulate this issue more precisely, if this contributor represents the level of "doctordre" that they are relying on. It is their business anyway.

I am Only interested in the academic aspects (specifically STRATEGIC thinking) of this issue.
Report to administrator

Comments are now closed for this entry