News

History has a strange way of repeating itself as two scions of Kenya’s founding fathers, Jomo Kenyatta and Jaramogi Oginga Odinga, fought for the Holy Grail in Kenya’s presidential election.

Once again it appears like Uhuru is destined for greatness just like his father outfoxed Jaramogi, Raila’s father and Kenya’s first vice president.

The Jubilee coalition flag bearer, Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta, was still ahead on Tuesday evening with nearly half of the votes counted in Kenya’s closely contested presidential vote. By the time we went to press, Uhuru held 53 per cent of the vote while Raila followed closely at 41.9 per cent.

However, the outcome could only feed into the narrative of ethnicity and the tyranny of numbers, as some analysts had predicted. By the end of the voter registration exercise on December 18, the largest number of voters recorded were in the Central where Kenyatta hails from and the Rift Valley, the birthplace of his running mate, William Ruto.

There was a large voter turnout registered in the Central province and Rift Valley as the pendulum swung favourably in Uhuru’s favour as results began trickling in at the electronic tally centre in Bomas of Kenya, Nairobi, which fed into this hypothesis.

The results also contrasted opinion polls, which largely favoured Raila apart from the Ipsos Synovate which placed Uhuru ahead of Raila with a 0.4 per cent advantage. But the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission chairman, Ahmed Isaack Hassan, said the results were only provisional. So, is there hope that Raila can rise from the early setback like the phoenix from the ashes?

It was not clear yet whether Raila could stage a comeback with more than 50 per cent of votes counted. But so significant was the margin that many believed it would be difficult for Raila to overtake Uhuru and emerge the winner in the first round. There was perhaps a slim chance that he could force a re-run by denying Uhuru a mandatory 50 per cent in the first round. It is also required that the winner must win at least 25 per cent votes in half of the 47 counties.

However, Raila had performed well at his home turf in Luo-Nyanza province for example getting about 90 per cent of the vote in Isiaya county. Raila also made forays into the western province, the home turf of Amani coalition candidate and outgoing deputy Premier Musalia Mudavadi where he got a majority of votes. Though Odinga’s running mate and outgoing Vice President Kalonzo Musyoka called for calm, he said he was confident of a victory because they had not yet tallied the results of Cord’s strongholds.

He, however, raised concern with the slow pace at which results are being tallied.

“We have noted that the process of releasing results by IEBC system is slow even in areas as close as Nairobi city and we have forwarded our concerns in this regard to them and we hope they will deal with them expeditiously and transparently,” Musyoka said yesterday.

The IEBC also said there was a major concern in regard to the large numbers of spoilt votes.

“During simulation, there were cases where voters were casting their ballot in the wrong ballot boxes. The colour coding seemed not to be good enough, but these are things we need to audit. Due to the complexity of this election, there is a higher number of spoilt votes than we would have wished to see. The IEBC will have a clear count of the spoilt votes at the end of the exercise,” Hassan told journalists at the National Tallying Centre at the Bomas of Kenya.

The spoilt votes by the time we went to press were more than the two per cent Mudavadi had got across the country. Other candidates who performed dismally included Paul Muite, the lawyer who was amongst President Daniel arap Moi’s regime fiercest critics. The election was by yesterday largely calm apart from the isolated incident where twelve people including six police officers were on Sunday night killed in an ambush in Mombasa and Kilifi counties hours before voting began on Monday morning.

An observer from the Citizens’ Coalition for Electoral Democracy in Uganda (CCEDU) , Crispy Kaheru, who is monitoring the elections from Nairobi told The Observer yesterday that though there were glitches, the IEBC had done a good job.

“First of all we need to appreciate the large logistical exercise the IEBC had to face. They have introduced an electronic voter system, which was a challenge,” said Kaheru.

However, he said the results reflected the ethnic face of Kenyan politics and also revealed that ‘there were high sales of machetes in Kisumu and Nakuru, which you cannot wish away.’

He also said that minority ethnic groups living in strongholds were quite vulnerable and faced intimidation during the voting exercise.
As a result of glitches, Isaack Hassan also announced that the results would not be announced in the next 48 hours but promised it would be within the next seven days as stipulated in the Constitution.

Early yesterday morning the Airtel and Safaricom servers broke down resulting in the delays of relaying the polls.

This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Comments

 
+3 #1 Ayela 2013-03-06 03:26
Observer early days..dont jump the gun....Odinga's still has a good chance to over turn this slight lead.
Quote
 
 
+2 #2 Jane 2013-03-06 12:16
If Uhuru Kenyatta wins, how will an elected head of state be treated by the ICC? Will he go back to The Hague to attend court or will the ICC issue a warrant of arrest like they've done for Bashir so effectively locking Kenyatta in Kenya if he wants to escape arrest. Could anyone who has any knowledge on this issue enlighten me?

On the issue of tribal/ population imbalance resulting in the continuous occupation of state house by a leader from central Kenya maybe they could try the system of electoral colleges adopted by the Americans to give a fair voice to the smaller tribes and sparsely populated districts/provinces. The British one man one vote may not be very effective in a highly tribalised society like Kenya.
Quote
 
 
+6 #3 kim 2013-03-06 13:26
ICC will wait till the elections are over and deal with UHURU. M7 and kagame still wait their turns for the Hague for genocide in congo, rwanda and northern uganda
Quote
 
 
+4 #4 Akullo 2013-03-06 14:36
Words cannot tell how I really feel for Odinga and his running mate Kalonzo Musyoka,they gave all their lives, all their best and I do pray God gives them and all who chose CORD the strength to persevere during this trying moment.

In this political election puzzle, one can clearly see distinct patterns of ethnicity and xenophobia. It think it is time to live and let live, even this ICC Uhuru-Ruto saga should just be dropped,like the South Africans did during the truth and reconciliation period.

As for the final outcomes of the elections, only God can tell.We pray for truth,peace and mercy to prevail. I really appreciate the selflessnes of Kalonzo Musyoka who stood by Odinga, it was almost unbelievable. I kept thinking any moment he would reverse his decision! May God bless you Kalonzo!
Quote
 
 
-2 #5 Akullo 2013-03-06 16:45
Kenya, is it finally Uhuru? Uhuru is a Swahili? word meaning independence. So is it finally time for independence? Only time will tell.

Secondly, it just surprises me : this cord between Uhuru, Kenyatta and Kenya, sometimes it makes me afraid of individualizati on of politics.

Thirdly, recent happenings just make me remember the Jews and how they failed to realize the timing of God's visitation, when they ended up killing the Messiah. It baffles me this rejection shown at home of Obama by his own fellow Africans.

Coz I believe a child remains a child,whatever his or her shortcomings, and Oginga Odinga is just at the receiving end of this sort of feeling. You know this fear of Obama-Odinga, perhaps a Kony link! Someone even wrote about fears of the posibility of a pan Luo dynasty!
What about that of a regional Tutsi-Hima-Bantustan one? God help us!
Quote
 
 
+2 #6 Otieno 2013-03-06 18:26
Uhuru is going to win this one because most africans Vote on Tribal lines nothing else.. tr The kikuyu's keep rigging elections and will do whatever it takes to make sure a kikuyu is elected president. It is very depressing and I do not know how the country will rebound from this one. I can only pray and hope for my country.
Quote
 
 
+2 #7 Gor mahia 2013-03-06 18:36
Kenya , taking this long to count votes is a huge embarrassment to your country .Instead of paying your politicians $150,000 to $300,000 per year ,which is a joke for any 3rd world country ,you should divert that money to hiring qualified database engineers .
Quote
 
 
0 #8 wodgot 2013-03-06 18:40
Uhuru and Museveni are one of. This election was rigged in favour of Uhuru while Odinga was being blindfolded with a 'monkey support'by president Museveni. Oginga's memory is too shallow; how could he believe the man who frequently accuses him of fronting/funding Mukula for presidency?

It's just a question of time for the news to unfold that president Museveni of Uganda, funded Uhuru and gave the Kenyan Gov't some clues of rigging election. Don't forget that Kiggundu (a reknown rigger) was there and he's the most trusted technocrat in rigging .Ask yourself: what was Kiggundu doing in Kenyan Elections when he's got completely no credibility in Uganda?
Quote
 
 
0 #9 DAVID 2013-03-06 21:23
@Jane

There is no diplomatic immunity at the ICC because its not even enshrined anywhere in the Rome statute. The duo (Uhuru and Ruto) probably wanted to stymie the course of justice hence their aspiration to the Kenyan political apex.

In the event that Uhuru wins the presidency and he dodges the ICC preceedings, that's when him and his deputy, Ruto, will be issued with arrest warrants which might have a negative impact to Kenya as a country.
Quote
 
 
0 #10 Kiiza 2013-03-07 02:34
Yes, its UHURU, and you cannot imagine how we the Banyoro view the whole thing. Those of you who know history remember that in fact the original Kenyatta was a son of Kabalega.

Kabalega fellow in love witha c ertain woman as he transited Kenya after his exile when he was banished by the British.

So we are very happy and in very celebratory mood. Do Uhuru...Gooooooooo!
Quote
 
 
0 #11 patrick 2013-03-07 07:16
Already reports are that up to 2% of the votes cast were spoiled and the issue of whether those votes should be counted is becoming a growing area of national concern.

It would appear that concern has a bearing on the eventual outcome of the election for the top job on Kenya. Interestingly, I read the Constitution of Kenya 2010 and think that it is silent on whether.

Spoilt votes would be counted on determining the winner on the elections. To be precise, the Constitution does not specify that that the winning candidate should obtain 50% and one vote OF VALID VOTES.

This to me is a problem in this elections.
Quote
 
 
0 #12 Jane 2013-03-07 13:38
@DAVID, thanks for the clarification. We may now be headed for uncharted territory of a sitting president and Vice President going on trial at the ICC as I've since read elsewhere that Uhuru says he will actually attend the trial if he wins. He will supposedly do it in rotation with his vice. We'll wait and see how that pans out.

@Patrick, I'm wondering if Kenyans are unfamiliar with ballot box stuffing as these votes may not be from registered vote booklets issued at a polling station but somehow find their way into a ballot box thus rendering them invalid. If they are included in the total votes cast, they may end up with more votes than registered voters since the turn out was very high. What would be the validity of such an election?

I've read somewhere that 12 ballots were recovered by the police at the roadside. Where did they come from? An amendment to the constitution may be required for future clarity.
Quote
 

This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.

Banner
Banner
Banner