Parliament has directed the Commission of Inquiry into the mismanagement of funds under the Universal Primary and Secondary education be wound up for failure to deliver.

The commission was set up in 2009 to, among others, inquire into the existence or ‘ghost pupils’ by class and of teachers by district; to inquire into the efficiency of using enrolment numbers vis-à-vis attendance as a basis for releasing capitation grants to schools; and to inquire into the process of disbursing UPE funds to the districts and to schools, including their use and adequacy.

Three years later, however, there has not been even an interim report, as the education minister, Jessica Alupo noted in her statement to Parliament yesterday. Instead, the commission has been asking for extensions.

“My office has not received a single interim report on any matter within the commission’s terms of reference. I am, therefore, unable to state whether or not the commission has made credible progress on any of its terms of reference. I, therefore, don’t have a substantive report to tender to Parliament,” Alupo said.

The commission, set up by President Museveni, was supposed to produce its findings within six months of establishment, but three years later, there is not a single report and yet Shs 6bn has been spent on its activities. At yesterday’s sitting, a motion was moved that the commission be wound up, that government should extend any additional funding, that the Auditor General conducts a special audit into the commission’s funds and that Parliament’s Social Services committee pursues the issue further.

The commission members are: Justice E. Muhanguzi (chairperson), Dr Nassali Lukwago (deputy chairperson), Lawrence Mukiibi, P.M Batumbya and Keturah Katunguka (secretary and counsel). Alupo’s statement followed an inquiry last week by Serere Woman MP, Alice Alaso, seeking to know the progress of the commission of inquiry. In Parliament yesterday, emotions run high, as legislators debated the minister’s statement. Leader of opposition, Nathan Nandala Mafabi, called for the arrest of the commissioners: “This justice (Muhanguzi) has not done justice to us. None of you should steal public money and we leave you!”

Many of the MPs were in unison that Alupo’s explanation was unconvincing.
“I am dismayed that money is being allocated for a commission which has no output,” said Monicah Amoding (NRM, Youth National).
“This is a lot of money and, given the situation we are in today, we shouldn’t spend more money on [the commission],” said Tim Lwanga (NRM, Kyamuswa) who also chairs the Budget committee of Parliament.

The UPE and USE programmes, although popular in rural areas, have come under a lot of criticism over their management and the quality of products they churn out. Last year, a report by Uwezo revealed that approximately 20 percent of primary three (P.3) pupils in UPE schools could not recognize the letters of the alphabet, compared to eight percent of their counterparts in private schools; and one percent of P.3 children under UPE could read and comprehend, compared to eight percent in private schools.

On teachers’ attendance, the report said on average, teacher absenteeism was 12 percent. It is this mischief that the commission intended to investigate and make recommendations, but with the suspension, it will be a while before interventions can be put in place. Speaking to The Observer after the proceedings, Alupo said she was uncomfortable with the Parliament resolve, adding that this means taxpayers’ money was put to waste.

“I thought that my statement was seeking enrichment from the House to find a way forward on how the work of the commission can be completed,” she said.
Actually, as she stated in her statement, Alupo wanted Parliament to extend the commission’s tenure to October.

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Comments

0 #1 J.P. Kanoni 2012-02-15 11:11
It is not enough to merely wind up the committee. The fact that Shs 6 billion has been spent on the committee's alleged activities must be acknowledged against the necessity for accountability and the principle of value for value.

The principal/prima ry client for whom the committee was supposed to do the work must answer why no demand or complaint was lodged in respect of the work that was originally intended to be done in 6 months, but is still undone after 3 years, in spite of an expenditure of a massive Shs 6 billion. Therefore both the committee members and the office for which the committee was set up must be accordingly charged for this blatant loss and abuse.
Report to administrator

This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.