The trial of a case against six people, including four pastors, accused of conspiring to tarnish the reputation of Pastor Robert Kayanja by alleging that he had been involved in homosexuality, has been halted after the accused petitioned the Chief Registrar of High Court alleging that the trial magistrate took a bribe.

The Chief Resister, Henry Peter Adonyo, has asked the Criminal Investigations Directorate of the police to urgently investigate the allegations. The defendants allege that Kayaja’s camp bribed Magistrate John Patrick Wekesa with, among others, a Mitsubishi Pajero, registration number UAQ 166P and an unspecified amount of money.

They claim that the vehicle, silver in colour, initially belonged to one of the pastors in Kayanja’s church, Rubaga Miracle Centre. In a letter dated December 15 and addressed to Adonyo and Buganda Road Chief Magistrate, Vincent Mugabo, the accused, through their lawyers, are seeking an order to force Wekesa out of the case and want hearing to start afresh. They cite bias and bribery, among other issues.

The accused are pastors Solomon Male of Arising for Christ ministries, Martin Sempa of Makerere Community Church, and Michael Kyazze and Robert Kayiira of Omega Healing Centre. The others are businesswoman Dorothy Kyomuhendo and musician David Mukalazi. They allegedly conspired to claim that Kayanja sodomised young men at his church.

Prosecution led by Stephen Asaba alleges that in 2008 and 2009 at various places within Kampala district, the accused “conspired to cause injury to Kayanja’s personality and reputation.”

One of the deponents, whose name we have withheld so as not to jeopardise investigations by the Chief Registrar and police, contends in his affidavit that he heard Wekesa boasting in Lugisu before workers building his house in his home village: “Those pastors in Kampala are foolish. They are homosexuals, but don’t want to admit it. But I don’t care; they have given me a car and I will drive it.”

When The Observer contacted the Chief Registrar on Monday, he confirmed that he had received the sodomy file that day and had embarked on investigations. He, however, declined to divulge details on the matter. But The Observer has, through impeccable sources, seen a copy of his letter dated December 20, addressed to the Director CID, expressing urgent need for through investigations into Wekesa’s conduct.

“Trial has been stayed pending the outcome of the investigations. This is to request you to urgently commence investigations on the two affidavits, which are attached. The matter is coming up for mention on January 18, 2012,” Adonyo wrote.

According to our investigations, Wekesa, who has been driving an old Toyota Corolla for some time, started driving the Pajero in question in the middle of hearing of the sodomy case. He also allegedly started building a house in his home village four months ago.

“I recognised a motor vehicle parked at the construction site and I saw Mr Wekesa, whom I had heard about from my brother (name withheld) as the person who owns the plot where the construction is going on. I saw him with several people, including his workers at the construction site and my brother, standing around the motor vehicle and appearing to be admiring it,” said one of the affidavits.

A source told The Observer that the vehicle in question costs about Shs 80m and that, with his salary of Shs 800,000 per month, it would take Wekesa at least 100 months to raise this amount without any side income and without spending on anything else, including National Social Security Fund (NSSF) deductions.

According to their letter, the defendants’ lawyers, from Sekabanja and Company Advocates, are complaining that Wekesa is biased and has on several occasions threatened to arrest them. They say he also blocked the defendants from tendering in court video and audio evidence, and sometimes assists prosecution witnesses with answers.

The lawyers, Kato Sekabanja and Paul Rutsiya, allege that there are instances on the record where Wekesa has recorded an answer for a witness and then crossed it out and written another one when the witness is asked the same question again.

“On September 29, 2011, he delivered a ruling for which we requested a typed copy. On reading, we found that it was at variance with what he had read in open court. On a previous occasion, he stopped one defence counsel, Mr Gamara, from asking any further questions in cross-examination, shutting him out completely,” the lawyers state in their letter.

Before petitioning the Chief Registrar, the defendants’ lawyers first wrote to Wekesa on December 13, seeking a meeting of all parties in his chambers on December 15, with an intention of asking him to get out of the case. Wekesa did not grant the request.

It was on this same day that Wekesa, reportedly without submissions from the defendants and without citing any authority, delivered a ruling to the effect that the accused had a case to answer. He set December 19, 2011 as hearing date for defence, despite his own complaint that he had received “numerous calls from all sides about this case”.

Wekesa allegedly told the defendants’ lawyers that he had received “numerous calls from all sides” about the case, which got them worried about his impartiality. When he set December 19 as the date for the accused to start their defence, the lawyers opposed the move.

“We also note that at the last hearing, you referred to questions by our learned brother counsel, Edward Akankwasa, as ‘gasiya’ (rubbish), a matter that was well reported in the press (The Observer) and the recordings,” the lawyers charged in their letter to the magistrate.

The judicial spokesperson, Elias Kisawuzi, to whom Buganda Road Chief Magistrate, Mugabo, referred The Observer, said he had not gathered enough information to enable him comment on the matter.

Wekesa could not be reached for a comment, as he was not in his chambers and his clerk could not provide any information. But The Observer has reliably learnt that Mugabo met with Wekesa and all parties in his chambers on Monday before retrieving the file and adjourning the case to January 18, 2011.

According to a source that attended the meeting, Wekesa vehemently denied the bribery allegations and said he was using his own money, as he had been engaged in a booming business even long before he began practising law.

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.


0 #1 Dungu 2011-12-22 09:10
The truth is that if God is the one who called Pastor Robert Kayanja, God will himself defend him. All we know is that we have seen God using him mightly.

It will be total shame to the serious accusers once God exposes them. Remember God is not a son of man.Whatever is beeing done , God is witness
Report to administrator
0 #2 livingstone 2011-12-22 10:39
Dear DUNGU,Do you believe it is miracles that make PASTORS too Godly,we have pastors like KAKANDE are you one of the believers their?,there must be reality&let it come out
Report to administrator
0 #3 Magala 2011-12-22 10:41
Truely you observe.Been longing for a paper that reports incidences without bias and hadnt found one.Observer is my Paper now. They shall know the truth and the truth shall set them free!
Report to administrator
0 #4 Muzzukulu Paulo 2011-12-22 10:51
Kayanja is corrupt from head to toe . Without the pretection from State House and the police , he would be in jail .
Report to administrator
0 #5 mico 2011-12-22 12:20
Its good yo are referring to God, unlike Kayanja who is leaning on money ,connection with government officials, bouncers , body guards , bribes etc
Report to administrator
0 #6 Pr Jamada 2011-12-22 16:28
Lord Jesus we pray for Pr. Kayanja to trust in God for protection and not the Kanyama's who carry PPU guns. Please help Kayanja to stop manipulating people with gifts in return for Joyce Meyer he gave $25000.

To the Police he gave "color" and matereals in Masindi. The problem is now how can the head of CID Grace Akullo who put this cover up together now investigate the magistrate who is possibly biased. Will whistleblowers also get abducted to change their stories?
Report to administrator
0 #7 paddy 2011-12-22 18:18
this so called pastor kayanja is just a shame and an insult to some who believe in christ.serve your self from embarassment and accept this,because you have than it to not new in contravacial not a man of God but a money maker with your connections in state house.
Report to administrator
0 #8 D Christine 2011-12-23 05:12
Thx Observer. We have been wondering how long the media will ignore a case of such importance. Our future and the future of our children lies in the hands of sober men who will stand for the truth no matter the cost!
Report to administrator
-1 #9 Barya Alfred 2011-12-23 10:32
The bible(God's holy book)is very clear.In the new tastment it causions us that,NOT EVERYONE WHO CALLS ME LORD LORD WILL ENTER THE KINGDOM OF HEAVENPerfoming miracles etc is not evident that they belong to God,afterall even satan does wonders.Im sorry but my conscience tells me that Kayanja is not aright person.

He has so many scandals to his name,infact when i see his followers i just shadder and feel sorry for them.Kayanja and all pastors i warn you,fine deceive man but remember their is abigger eye which sees all coners.Be prepared for God's wrath very very soon.PRAISE BE TO GOD ALMIGHTY
Report to administrator
+1 #10 B.T.M 2011-12-23 11:21
Between 1990 and 1993 , I used to work in Sheraton. Pastor Kayanja had a white man.a frend who had a parmanent room on the 6th floor. Kayanja and this man used to sell dollars and travellers cheques. I was one of the Hotel employees who helped to get them clients for a small commission.

Kayanja`s friend used to ask us if we could find him boys who would share his room for a pay. We told him that it was not eazy to find such boys but we could get him girls. He said that he was only interested in boys.

I later found that he and Kayanja had 2 boys who used to vist and sometimes stay in the room for days. These boys could sit and eat separately in the dinning room.

Security informed us not to bother them . We were told that they were members of Miracle Centre Band. I believe that these are the boys that have been collecting money from both sides of this case.

Even if Kayanja himself is not homosexual , he must know that his white friend was having sex with these boys.

I am amazed that there are poeple who believe that Kayanja is what he claims to be. But I admitt that he is a miracle man because he has succeeded fooling so many people and gotten so rich from it.
Report to administrator
0 #11 Wambede Jimmy 2011-12-23 12:26
People (including pastors) are born with characters which, quite often, may not be suitable for the occupation(s) they undertake during their lifetime.

An occupation can be imposed upon an individual by the circumstances of the times and can be changed at will, but it is not possible for one to change his/her character.

Pastors, if indeed they men of God, should be men of integrity, chosen by God Himself to "serve according to his will". However, some of our "self-anointed" pastors would have done better as businessmen or politicians, but for some man-made reasons, found themselves on the pulpit.

So, if Robert Kayanja (and company) is found guilty of sodomy, one ought to understand that his self-assigned occupation/miss ion of a pastor is in conflict with his true character.
Report to administrator
0 #12 declan 2011-12-24 02:22
Report to administrator

This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.